<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cut Hypocrisy First, Not Tariffs: The Key to Breaking the WTO Deadlock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://triplecrisis.com/cut-hypocrisy-first-not-tariffs-the-key-to-breaking-the-wto-deadlock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://triplecrisis.com/cut-hypocrisy-first-not-tariffs-the-key-to-breaking-the-wto-deadlock/</link>
	<description>Global Perspectives on Finance, Development, and Environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akshaya</title>
		<link>http://triplecrisis.com/cut-hypocrisy-first-not-tariffs-the-key-to-breaking-the-wto-deadlock/comment-page-1/#comment-558734</link>
		<dc:creator>Akshaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triplecrisis.com/?p=824#comment-558734</guid>
		<description>I think it is quite an interesting proposal that is described in this article. U.S has been providing subsidies and benefits to its farmers while preaching free trade and reduction of subsidies for farmers of the developing countries. This has given the farmers of U.S. and the American economy an unfair advantage over the developing countries whose economy is agrarian and farmers who have to depend largely on these revenues for their day-to-day survival. 

Providing subsidies to some of the bigger developing countries which protest the U.S.&#039;s unfair trade practices is not the way to justify subsidies and maintain status quo. Does the practice of reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers not apply to the U.S simply because it suggests it to the other countries? On the contrary, the U.S. should practice before it preaches the same to the other countries. Without doing so, it can only be accused of hypocrisy. One of the arguments that the U.S. uses to justify its subsidies is that without its farm commodity programs, the food prices for Americans would be too high and food availability would be insecure. In the U.S., people living in the rural areas have access to almost the same level and quality of service provision as those in the cities. Their incomes are relatively high, especially for farmers, agricultural land sizes are huge, and only a small portion of the population is dependent on agriculture. Compare and contrast this to the situation in most developing countries - incomes are lower, especially for farmers, as compared to other occupations, quality and provision of services is always better in the urban areas and the land sizes for farmers is small, and a huge section of the national population is dependent on agriculture for their subsistence. Providing subsidies to developed countries&#039; farmers only reduces the markets for the farm products from developing countries which already have to battle within their economy to be competitive in the world market. Added to this, if they have to compete with highly-subsidised farm products from developed countries which have better technology and skills to produce these products, their economy will collapse and millions of people will be affected only because the developed countries do not want to open their markets completely. 

When formulating bills and national policies the governments of developed countries should not only think of the interests of their economy and people but as global citizens should be aware of the impacts these would have on the people of other lesser developed countries and act accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is quite an interesting proposal that is described in this article. U.S has been providing subsidies and benefits to its farmers while preaching free trade and reduction of subsidies for farmers of the developing countries. This has given the farmers of U.S. and the American economy an unfair advantage over the developing countries whose economy is agrarian and farmers who have to depend largely on these revenues for their day-to-day survival. </p>
<p>Providing subsidies to some of the bigger developing countries which protest the U.S.&#8217;s unfair trade practices is not the way to justify subsidies and maintain status quo. Does the practice of reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers not apply to the U.S simply because it suggests it to the other countries? On the contrary, the U.S. should practice before it preaches the same to the other countries. Without doing so, it can only be accused of hypocrisy. One of the arguments that the U.S. uses to justify its subsidies is that without its farm commodity programs, the food prices for Americans would be too high and food availability would be insecure. In the U.S., people living in the rural areas have access to almost the same level and quality of service provision as those in the cities. Their incomes are relatively high, especially for farmers, agricultural land sizes are huge, and only a small portion of the population is dependent on agriculture. Compare and contrast this to the situation in most developing countries &#8211; incomes are lower, especially for farmers, as compared to other occupations, quality and provision of services is always better in the urban areas and the land sizes for farmers is small, and a huge section of the national population is dependent on agriculture for their subsistence. Providing subsidies to developed countries&#8217; farmers only reduces the markets for the farm products from developing countries which already have to battle within their economy to be competitive in the world market. Added to this, if they have to compete with highly-subsidised farm products from developed countries which have better technology and skills to produce these products, their economy will collapse and millions of people will be affected only because the developed countries do not want to open their markets completely. </p>
<p>When formulating bills and national policies the governments of developed countries should not only think of the interests of their economy and people but as global citizens should be aware of the impacts these would have on the people of other lesser developed countries and act accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lark</title>
		<link>http://triplecrisis.com/cut-hypocrisy-first-not-tariffs-the-key-to-breaking-the-wto-deadlock/comment-page-1/#comment-227961</link>
		<dc:creator>lark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 22:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triplecrisis.com/?p=824#comment-227961</guid>
		<description>I should also point out that the USA isn&#039;t effective enough to the be sinister force you describe. We have been chattering about the value of the yuan and cajoling / pleading / begging China to revalue for years now - to absolutely no effect. We just lose more and more jobs. That is because the WTO is not fair - we are being messed with, and there is no effective remedy available. This pickle is what needs fixing, not the &#039;problems&#039; you describe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also point out that the USA isn&#8217;t effective enough to the be sinister force you describe. We have been chattering about the value of the yuan and cajoling / pleading / begging China to revalue for years now &#8211; to absolutely no effect. We just lose more and more jobs. That is because the WTO is not fair &#8211; we are being messed with, and there is no effective remedy available. This pickle is what needs fixing, not the &#8216;problems&#8217; you describe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lark</title>
		<link>http://triplecrisis.com/cut-hypocrisy-first-not-tariffs-the-key-to-breaking-the-wto-deadlock/comment-page-1/#comment-227955</link>
		<dc:creator>lark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 21:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triplecrisis.com/?p=824#comment-227955</guid>
		<description>I think you are lecturing pointlessly, because what globalization has meant to the average Americans is declining jobs and incomes, and rising debt. Our insecurity has soared, thanks to these ridiculous policies that serve only our elites. So there is no point in more liberalization. It is high time to put the priority on American jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are lecturing pointlessly, because what globalization has meant to the average Americans is declining jobs and incomes, and rising debt. Our insecurity has soared, thanks to these ridiculous policies that serve only our elites. So there is no point in more liberalization. It is high time to put the priority on American jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doha Demands May Kill WTO Agreement: Wise interview on The Real News Network &#187; TripleCrisis</title>
		<link>http://triplecrisis.com/cut-hypocrisy-first-not-tariffs-the-key-to-breaking-the-wto-deadlock/comment-page-1/#comment-227650</link>
		<dc:creator>Doha Demands May Kill WTO Agreement: Wise interview on The Real News Network &#187; TripleCrisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 15:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triplecrisis.com/?p=824#comment-227650</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T R Nagesh</title>
		<link>http://triplecrisis.com/cut-hypocrisy-first-not-tariffs-the-key-to-breaking-the-wto-deadlock/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>T R Nagesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triplecrisis.com/?p=824#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>The latest stance of the US will only backfire. Rising economies and developing countries have become more conscious of American and EU tactics. They are increasingly like to follow the  policy of &quot;Enlightened Self-Interest&quot; making WTO negotiations that more difficult</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest stance of the US will only backfire. Rising economies and developing countries have become more conscious of American and EU tactics. They are increasingly like to follow the  policy of &#8220;Enlightened Self-Interest&#8221; making WTO negotiations that more difficult</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehdi Shafaeddin</title>
		<link>http://triplecrisis.com/cut-hypocrisy-first-not-tariffs-the-key-to-breaking-the-wto-deadlock/comment-page-1/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>Mehdi Shafaeddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triplecrisis.com/?p=824#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>The hypocrisy by EU is not in fact less than that of the USA. Example: what EU is trying to impose on poor countries through EPA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hypocrisy by EU is not in fact less than that of the USA. Example: what EU is trying to impose on poor countries through EPA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

